Picturefill – the solution that most closely resembles the picture tag Improving your element dimensioning using the box-sizing propertyĬustomizing the font family for beautiful responsive titlesĮxercise 4 – customizing the homepage titleĬontrol of art direction for responsive imagesįoresight – selecting the right image to display depending on the screen size Understanding and converting the text to relative units Setting up the meta tag of viewport before startingĮxercise 2a – creating the layout design for wireframesĮxercise 2b – using Foundation4 Grid to structure our websiteĭesigning a menu by improving its usabilityĮxercise 3 – customizing menu using the toggle menu solution How percentage gives flexibility to the structure Understanding the concept of responsive web designĬomparing responsive, fluid, and adaptive webĮxercise 1 – practicing mobile-first development in wireframes Guys, this is not an insult to you, I am trying to help make sure your expectations are set correctly.Support files, eBooks, discount offers and more Otherwise they are hand coded and it is very difficult to create that way as well. That is how all the responsive website builders work right now. As I said above, you will still need to specify what objects you want to appear at each screen dimension, where you want objects to be placed on each screen dimensions etc. But quoting articles online and telling me something is insufficient isn't helping. Guys, we are listening and working on these things. WE NEED a real responsive design and not an ersatz !!! The mobile page only is absolutely insufficient when providing a mobile version (it was a workaround for the last years). When viewed on my iMac at the full width of the screen it is stretched out so much that it looks deformed. If you look at the media queries in the stylesheet for the above mentioned site you will see that the upper limit is around 1200 px but the designer hasn't locked it at that. The designer of the website you referred to obviously doesn't realise this and hasn't looked at the site when viewed at full width on a 27 inch screen! Wide pages are not a good idea and the generally accepted "standard" width is 980px.I don't even look at websites that are wider than around 1000px since I don't have my browser window extended further than this and refuse to resort to horizontal scrolling.Įven with designs that employ a dynamic width, most designers would set a maximum width so that the contents won't spread out across wider screens. On these machines, the user has no control over the browser width like they do on actual computers. Responsive designs are more suited to websites aimed at mobile devices. Is that possible with Everweb? Am I making sense? I want to be able to do what the first site did without having people with smaller screen scroll left to right. So I have the content centered in the middle of the page and the white background in the back when I'd much rather extend those top and bottom blocks to the edge of everyones screen. If I design it to fit my screen (17in mac) then it's incredibly large on other screens. For instance: This YMCA website responds to fit your screen no matter the size of your screen. What I want to do is make my page where the content is always centered no matter the size of the screen being used whilst also having the shapes (filled boxes) extend to the edges of the screen. I'm not concerned about mobile sites, I know I can create that on Everweb. NOTE: I am an EverWeb user and NOT affiliated with EverWeb! Any opinions expressed in this forum are my own. Most traditional web designers are used to having a large canvas to fill up with unnecessary whistles in the hope of impressing their clients and find it difficult to let them go. Mobile sites need less content and a minimum of images which should be carefully optimized. It's better to design a mobile site as a separate project because it has different requirements like the fact that all the user inputs should be bigger and that hovers (mouseover) don't work on these devices. Ideally you should have a fixed width version of the site for visitors who are using personal computers and a responsive version for those on mobile devices. It is possible to create a one size fits all design but, to do it successfully, you really need to have a good working knowledge of media queries and be prepared to spend a lot of time testing the layout on all the different devices. I spent quite a lot of time in the past doing the front end coding for responsive sites and, from this experience, I can agree with Paul that a responsive website is not the best solution in most cases.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |